Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Diaz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Diaz Anchor | green | “in cases where a judge admits to wrongdoing and the jqc's findings are undisputed this court will ordinarily conclude that the jqc's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence.” | 15 |
| 2 | In Re Pando | green | “this court reviews the findings of the jqc to determine if they are supported by clear and convincing evidence and reviews the recommendation of discipline to determine whether it should be approved.” | 8 |
| 3 | Inquiry Concerning Davey | green | “the ultimate power and responsibility in making a determination rests with this court.” | 7 |
| 4 | In Re Andrews | green | “this court reviews the findings of the jqc to determine if they are supported by clear and convincing evidence and reviews the recommendation of discipline to determine whether it should be approved.” | 4 |
| 5 | In Re Maloney | green | “a public reprimand, as disciplinary action, is consistent with governing precedent regarding sanctions for judicial misconduct where a judge uses the prestige of judicial office to obtain favorable treatment for himself or another individual.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.