Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kevin R. v. Superior Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kevin R. v. Superior Court Anchor | green | “we review the record in the light most favorable to the court's determinations and draw all reasonable inferences from the evidence to support the findings and orders. 'we do not reweigh the evidence or exercise independent judgment, but merely determine if there are sufficient …” | 21 |
| 2 | TONYA M. v. Superior Court | green | “when a child is removed from a parent's custody, the juvenile court ordinarily must order child welfare services for the minor and the parent for the purpose of facilitating reunification of the family.” | 10 |
| 3 | Tracy J. v. Superior Court | green | “to protect children from harm and to preserve families when safe for the child.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.