Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 345 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd. Anchor | green | “the defendant has certain minimum contacts with . . . new jersey such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” | 146 |
| 2 | Miller Yacht Sales, Inc. v. Steven Smith | green | “new jersey's long-arm statute provides for jurisdiction coextensive with the due process requirements of the united states constitution.” | 80 |
| 3 | Vetrotex Certainteed Corporation v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products Company | green | “informational communications in furtherance of a contract between a resident and a nonresident does not establish the purposeful activity necessary for a valid assertion of personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant.” | 32 |
| 4 | MURPHY v. EISAI, INC (U.S.) | green | “the facts and allegations do not rise to the level where i, within my discretion, would permit further exploration through jurisdictional discovery.” | 24 |
| 5 | Eurofins Pharma US Holdings v. BioAlliance Pharma SA | green | “a federal district court may assert personal jurisdiction over a nonresident of the state in which the court sits to the extent authorized by the law of that state.” | 21 |
| 6 | Ontel Products Corp. v. Mindscope Products | green | “plaintiff does not provide any evidence that reasonably suggests that indirect sales in new jersey occur at all or that those sales surpass the defendant's third party sales made elsewhere.” | 21 |
| 7 | Christa Fischer v. Federal Express Corp | green | “for a corporation, general jurisdiction is only proper in states where the corporation is fairly regarded as 'at home,' which generally is restricted to the corporation's state of incorporation or the state of its principal place of business.” | 21 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.