Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walter Dartland v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Sergio Pereira.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walter Dartland v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Sergio Pereira Anchor | green | “no bright-line standard puts the reasonable public employer on notice of a constitutional violation, the employer is entitled to immunity except in the extraordinary case where first amendment case law would lead to the inevitable conclusion that the act taken against the employ…” | 21 |
| 2 | Baxter ex rel. Baxter v. Vigo County School Corp. | red | “since tinker, however, the supreme court has cast some doubt on the extent to which students retain free speech rights in the school setting” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. John Allan Crawley | green | “so instead of asking what the word 'dictum' means we can ask what reasons there are against a court's giving weight to a passage found in a previous opinion.” | 5 |
| 4 | Sadegh Shamloo v. Mississippi State Board of Trustees of Institutions of Higher Learning | green | “must constitute a material and substantial interference with discipline.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.