Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William Marohnic v. Richard Walker and the Barren River Regional Mental Health-Mental Retardation Board, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William Marohnic v. Richard Walker and the Barren River Regional Mental Health-Mental Retardation Board, Incorporated Anchor | green | “public interest is near its zenith when ensuring that public organizations are being operated in accordance with the law.” | 32 |
| 2 | Everett Perry v. Kenneth McGinnis | green | “the interest of the employee as a citizen, in commenting on matters of public concern, outweighs the employer's interest in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.