Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Estate of Rennick.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Estate of Rennick Anchor | green | “judicial admissions are defined as deliberate, clear, unequivocal statements by a party about a concrete fact within that party's knowledge.” | 25 |
| 2 | People v. Jackson | green | “whether there is sufficient similarity between the misconduct at issue in the present case and the misconduct shown in other cases.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Tyler | green | “since the vast majority of the cases presented by defendant involve allegations of police misconduct by two or more detectives, it is crucial to consider the claims of a systemic pattern of abuse in the context of several officers working together to obtain a false confession in…” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Harris | green | “whether any of the officers who interrogated defendant may have participated in systemic interrogation abuse” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.