Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Neama El Sayed Ramadan Gaser Hesham El Gendy v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neama El Sayed Ramadan Gaser Hesham El Gendy v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Anchor | green | “questions involving the application of statutes or regulations to undisputed facts, sometimes referred to as mixed questions of fact and law.” | 18 |
| 2 | Shkulaku-Purballori v. Mukasey | green | “review asylum applications denied for untimeliness only when the appeal seeks review of constitutional claims or matters of statutory construction, not when the question is discretionary or factual.” | 5 |
| 3 | Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc. | green | “it is a well-established rule of this circuit that one panel cannot overrule the holding of another panel, absent an intervening inconsistent opinion from the u.s. supreme court,” | 4 |
| 4 | Yidong Bu v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “she acted based on a political opinion and that her actions were interpreted as such by her alleged persecutors.” | 4 |
| 5 | Petro Lugovyj v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. | green | “mere defiance of unidentified thugs' extortion demands” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.