Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eileen McAfee v. Christine Boczar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eileen McAfee v. Christine Boczar Anchor | green | “the proper calculation of an attorney's fee award involves a three-step process.” | 14 |
| 2 | Depaoli v. Vacation Sales Associates, L.L.C. | green | “by evidence of what attorneys earn from paying clients for similar services in similar circumstances.” | 9 |
| 3 | Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. Holiday | green | “previous awards in the relevant marketplace as a barometer for how much to award counsel in the immediate case.” | 6 |
| 4 | Johnson v. City of Aiken | green | “some percentage of the remaining amount, depending on the degree of success enjoyed by the party seeking fees.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.