Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc. Anchor | green | “under long-standing tenth circuit precedent, supervisors and other employees may not be held personally liable under title vii.” | 16 |
| 2 | Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon | green | “the district court must dismiss an nmhra claim if the prerequisites of obtaining an order from the division and appealing that order within thirty days are not satisfied.” | 7 |
| 3 | Boulder County Commissioners v. Suncor Energy | green | “federal interest is not critical enough to trigger substantial-question jurisdiction because... whatever federal issues exist do not fundamentally change the state tort nature of the action.” | 6 |
| 4 | Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon | green | “full compliance with nmhra grievance procedures is a prerequisite to filing an nmhra claim in district court.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.