Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Goswami v. American Collections Enterprise, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goswami v. American Collections Enterprise, Inc. Anchor | green | “assume that the plaintiff-debtor is neither shrewd nor experienced in dealing with creditors.” | 13 |
| 2 | Goswami v. American Collections Enterprise, Inc. | green | “at the same time we do not consider the debtor as tied to the very last rung on the intelligence or sophistication ladder.” | 12 |
| 3 | Taylor v. Perrin, Landry, deLaunay & Durand | green | “this standard serves the dual purpose of protecting all consumers, including the inexperienced, the untrained and the credulous, from deceptive debt collection practices and protecting debt collectors against liability for bizarre or idiosyncratic consumer interpretations of col…” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.