Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. Anchor | green | “encouraged an employer to withdraw from a financially shaky plan and risk paying its share if the plan later became insolvent, rather than to remain and (if others withdrew) risk having to bear alone the entire cost of keeping the shaky plan afloat.” | 12 |
| 2 | Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc. | green | “employers who withdraw from underfunded multiemployer pension plans to pay withdrawal liability.” | 12 |
| 3 | Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. | green | “liable for a fair share of the plan's underfunding.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.