Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hicklin Engineering, L.C., Cross-Appellee v. R.J. Bartell and R.J. Bartell & Associates, L.L.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hicklin Engineering, L.C., Cross-Appellee v. R.J. Bartell and R.J. Bartell & Associates, L.L.C. Anchor | red | “any step that withdraws an element of the judicial process from public view makes the ensuing decision look more like fiat and requires rigorous justification” | 15 |
| 2 | Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | green | “the public has a legitimate interest in the record compiled in a legal proceeding because the public pays for the courts,” | 10 |
| 3 | Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | green | “the seventh circuit stated that it will deny outright any motion to maintain the confidentiality of information that fails to 'analyze in detail, document by document, the propriety of secrecy, providing reasons and legal citations.” | 4 |
| 4 | Whitlow v. Martin | green | “the burden is on movants to explain how these discovery responses are inadequate.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.