Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Druffel v. State, Department of Transportation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Druffel v. State, Department of Transportation Anchor | green | “statutes are construed under the assumption that the legislature was aware of all other statutes and legal precedence at the time the statute was passed.” | 9 |
| 2 | Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc. | green | “where the clear implication of a legislative act is to change the common law rule we recognize the modification because the legislature has the power to abrogate the common law.” | 8 |
| 3 | Winn v. Frasher | green | “address only the precise question that was framed by the motion and answered by the trial court.” | 4 |
| 4 | Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Mussell | green | “entitled to make any uses of their property that do not unreasonably interfere with the district's enjoyment of its irrigation easement.” | 3 |
| 5 | Carson v. Elliott | green | “easement owner has a right to remove obstructions unreasonably interfering with use of the easement, so long as there is no breach of the peace.” | 3 |
| 6 | Bilow v. Preco, Inc. | green | “free to apply general rules of statutory construction to ascertain” | 3 |
| 7 | Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal Savings | yellow | “we conclude that neither the provisions expressed in a channel change easement nor the quoted language of the statute . . . operate to create a greater right” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.