Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 33 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hartog v. Hartog.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartog v. Hartog Anchor | green | “reasonable needs and predivorce standard of living in the context of the other enumerated statutory factors” | 18 |
| 2 | Le v. Le | green | “a party has paid the other party's share of what proves to be marital debt, such as the mortgage, taxes, and insurance on the marital residence, reimbursement is required” | 6 |
| 3 | In re Mikia H. | green | “we nevertheless exercise our discretion to treat the notice of appeal as valid and deem the appeal as taken from the amended judgment” | 3 |
| 4 | Kaufman v. Kaufman | green | “since fica taxes should be deducted only from income upon which fica taxes are 'actually paid' prior to applying the provisions of domestic relations law 240 (1-b) (c)” | 3 |
| 5 | Southwick v. Southwick | green | “is only entitled to a credit in the amount of one half of his household expenditures during the period he occupied the marital residence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.