Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 319 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harold H. Huggins Realty, Inc. v. FNC, INC..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harold H. Huggins Realty, Inc. v. FNC, INC. Anchor | green | “a claim for relief is implausible on its face when 'the well-pleaded facts do not permit the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct.” | 98 |
| 2 | Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Louisiana State | green | “to be plausible, the complaint's 'factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” | 86 |
| 3 | Brand Coupon Network, LLC v. Catalina Marketing Corp. | green | “although a 'court may also consider documents attached to either a motion to dismiss or an opposition to that motion when the documents are referred to in the pleadings and are central to a plaintiff's claims,' . . . the court need not do so.” | 77 |
| 4 | Hamilton v. Dallas County | green | “to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 31 |
| 5 | Barfield v. Madison County, MS | green | “when adjudicating claims for which state law provides the rules of decision, we are bound to apply the law as interpreted by the state's highest court.” | 22 |
| 6 | Jorge-Chavelas v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. | green | “louisiana's 'constitution, codes, and statutes' are of paramount importance to its judges.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.