Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Setco Enterprises, Corporation v. Denzil W. Robbins, Roberta A. Robbins, Setco Enterprises, Corporation v. Denzil W. Robbins, Roberta A. Robbins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Setco Enterprises, Corporation v. Denzil W. Robbins, Roberta A. Robbins, Setco Enterprises, Corporation v. Denzil W. Robbins, Roberta A. Robbins Anchor | green | “whether the district the plaintiff chose had a substantial connection to the claim, whether or not other forums had greater contacts.” | 22 |
| 2 | Richard \Bud\" Steen v. Robert Murray" | green | “the court's focus must be on relevant activities of the defendant in the forum state, not on the effect of those activities on the plaintiff in the forum state.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.