Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Anchor | red | “to view statements given during airport interviews as valuable impeachment sources because of the conditions under which they are taken and because a newly-arriving alien cannot be expected to divulge every detail of the persecution he or she sustained.” | 8 |
| 2 | Norma Antonia Jacinto and Ronald Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Opinion | green | “prejudice occurs when the rights of the alien have been transgressed in such a way as is likely to impact the results of the proceedings.” | 6 |
| 3 | Norma Antonia Jacinto and Ronald Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Opinion | green | “due process requires that an alien receive a full and fair hearing.” | 5 |
| 4 | B-Y | green | “when the required frivolousness warnings have been given to the applicant prior to the start of a merits hearing, the immigration judge is not required to afford additional warnings or seek further explanation in regard to inconsistencies that have become obvious to the applican…” | 4 |
| 5 | Yan Xia Zhu v. Mukasey | green | “more detailed testimony at the hearing before the ij” | 3 |
| 6 | B-Y | green | “the opportunity for explanation requires that an immigration judge not rely on inconsistencies that take an applicant by surprise.” | 3 |
| 7 | B-Y | green | “brought to the attention of the applicant during the course of the hearing” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.