Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Marriage of Crosetto.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Marriage of Crosetto Anchor | green | “does not require mathematical precision, but rather fairness, based upon a consideration of all the circumstances of the marriage, both past and present, and an evaluation of the future needs of parties.” | 19 |
| 2 | In re the Marriage of Byerley | green | “it bases its decision on untenable grounds or acts for untenable reasons or if the decision is manifestly unreasonable.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Marriage of Meredith | green | “performs its functions regularly and properly without bias or prejudice.” | 3 |
| 4 | Damian Schwarz v. Susan M. Schwarz | green | “the character of property . . . is determined at the time of acquisition.” | 3 |
| 5 | In re the Marriage of: Ellen Doneen and James Doneen | green | “because the trial court is in the best position to determine what is fair, this court will reverse its decision only if there has been a manifest abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.