Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 317 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Landon v. Plasencia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Landon v. Plasencia Anchor | green | “long held that an alien seeking initial admission to the united states requests a privilege and has no constitutional rights regarding his application, for the power to admit or exclude aliens is a sovereign prerogative.” | 133 |
| 2 | United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy | green | “whatever the procedure authorized by congress is, it is due process as far as an alien denied entry is concerned.” | 91 |
| 3 | Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam | green | “treated' for due process purposes 'as if stopped at the border.” | 63 |
| 4 | Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe | green | “plaintiffs who assert a right to a hearing under the due process clause must show that the facts they seek to establish in that hearing are relevant under the statutory scheme.” | 30 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.