Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Thomaston.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Thomaston Anchor | green | “the inclusion of the permitted use in the ordinance is tantamount to a legislative finding that the permitted use is in harmony with the general zoning plan and will not adversely affect the neighborhood” | 26 |
| 2 | Kearney v. Kita | green | “determination 'should be sustained upon judicial review if it was not illegal, had a rational basis, and was not arbitrary and capricious” | 3 |
| 3 | Sunrise Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Town Board of the Town of Babylon | green | “once it is shown that the contemplated use is in conformance with the conditions imposed, the special use permit must be granted unless there are reasonable grounds for its denial, supported by substantial evidence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.