Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adkins v. Kaspar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adkins v. Kaspar Anchor | green | “a government action or regulation creates a 'substantial burden' on a religious exercise if it truly pressures the adherent to significantly modify his religious behavior and significantly violate his religious beliefs.” | 20 |
| 2 | Mayfield v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice | green | “demonstrate that its action was supported by a compelling interest and that the regulation is the least restrictive means of carrying out that interest.” | 6 |
| 3 | Cerda v. 2004-EQR1 L.L.C. | green | “following a bench trial, we review the district court's conclusions of law de novo and its factual findings for clear error.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.