Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Sandoval.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Sandoval Anchor | green | “a 'reasonable probability' exists if the defendant 'convinces the court that a decision to reject the plea bargain would have been rational under the circumstances.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Buckman | green | “a bare allegation that a petitioner would not have pleaded guilty if he had known all the consequences of the plea is not sufficient to establish prejudice,' regardless of whether that allegation is credible or not.” | 9 |
| 3 | Matter of Personal Restraint of Riley | green | “a bare allegation that a petitioner would not have pleaded guilty if he had known all the consequences of the plea is not sufficient to establish prejudice,' regardless of whether that allegation is credible or not.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Buckman | green | “rationality is an objective inquiry informed by the circumstances of the defendant.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.