Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Native Ecosystems Council v. United States Forest Service Anchor | green | “under the apa, we may set aside an agency decision if it is 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 14 |
| 2 | Tribal Village Of Akutan v. Hodel | green | “later stage of the exploration process.” | 3 |
| 3 | Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Kempthorne | green | “improperly minimizing negative side effects.” | 3 |
| 4 | Edwardsen v. United States Department of the Interior | green | “contains a reasonably thorough discussion” | 3 |
| 5 | Edwardsen v. United States Department of the Interior | green | “we review an environmental impact statement under a rule of reason to determine whether it contains a reasonably thorough discussion” | 3 |
| 6 | Environmental Defense Center, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency | green | “we defer to an agency decision not to invest the resources necessary to conduct the perfect study . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.