Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Rivera.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Rivera Anchor | green | “when an ineffective assistance claim is raised for the first time on appeal, it presents a question of law.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Garrido | green | “choosing to forgo a limiting instruction can be a reasonable decision to avoid drawing attention to unfavorable testimony.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Popp | green | “a curative instruction may actually serve to draw the jury's attention toward the subject matter of the instruction and further emphasize the issue the instruction is attempting to cure.” | 7 |
| 4 | State v. Hart | green | “just because counsel can make an objection does not mean counsel must make an objection to avoid rendering ineffective assistance. legal objections are an inherently strategic business.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.