Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Anchor | green | “to prevent the 'great personal tragedy' suffered by employees whose vested benefits are not paid when pension plans are terminated.” | 25 |
| 2 | Local 144 Hospital Welfare Fund v. Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc. (In Re Baptist Medical Center of New York, Inc.) | green | “the bankruptcy code and erisa must be interpreted together.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.