Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Murff v. Murff.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murff v. Murff Anchor | green | “such factors as the spouses' capacities and abilities, benefits which the party not at fault would have derived from continuation of the marriage, business opportunities, education, relative physical conditions, relative financial condition and obligations, disparity of ages, si…” | 25 |
| 2 | O'CAROLAN v. Hopper | green | “the trial court's discretion is not unlimited, and there must be some reasonable basis for an unequal division of the property.” | 9 |
| 3 | Schlueter v. Schlueter | green | “texas recognizes the concept of fraud on the community, which is a wrong by one spouse that the court may consider in its division of the estate of the parties and that may justify an unequal division of the property.” | 7 |
| 4 | Faddoul, Glasheen & Valles, P.C. v. Oaxaca | green | “a temporary injunction becomes moot when it becomes inoperative due to a change in status of the parties or the passage of time, or because it has expired.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.