Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Chatham Corp. v. Beltram.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Chatham Corp. v. Beltram Anchor | green | “the ability to reconsider and change one's mind is, in most aspects of human endeavor, a virtue more often than a vice. in matters such as this, however, it risks the danger of being labelled capricious.” | 4 |
| 2 | Lawson v. Bowie State University | green | “inconsistent with the nature of the pertinent statute. . . .” | 4 |
| 3 | Shader v. Hampton Improvement Ass'n | green | “facts necessary to resolve the pertinent issues that were adjudicated in that action” | 4 |
| 4 | Allmond v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene | green | “in reviewing an agency's fact findings, we apply a substantial evidence test, which is deferential to the agency's determinations.” | 4 |
| 5 | Broadway Services v. Comptroller | green | “substantial evidence exists if 'a reasonable mind might accept the evidence as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 4 |
| 6 | Powell v. Breslin | green | “all matters actually litigated or that could have been litigated.” | 4 |
| 7 | Shannon v. State | green | “akin to moving the goal posts after the game has begun.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.