Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McLin v. Twenty-First Judicial Dist.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McLin v. Twenty-First Judicial Dist Anchor | green | “when a rule 12(b)(1) motion is filed with other rule 12 motions, the court first considers its jurisdiction.” | 13 |
| 2 | Abdullah v. Paxton | green | “accepts all well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint as true and views them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” | 8 |
| 3 | McLin v. Twenty-First Judicial Dist | green | “the burden of proof is on the party asserting jurisdiction.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.