Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeter v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeter v. Astrue Anchor | green | “district courts may consider the lodestar method in determining the reasonableness of a 406(b) fee, but the lodestar calculation alone cannot constitute the basis for an 'unreasonable' finding.” | 16 |
| 2 | Earleen Smith v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of Deborah Spector and Ellyn Hershman | green | “a petition for fees under 406(b)(1) must be brought within a reasonable time.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.