Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Detlefson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Detlefson Anchor | green | “it cannot be said that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the front porch of his home where, presumably, delivery men and others were free to observe the plants thereon.” | 9 |
| 2 | Linda Denno, as Parent, Legal Guardian and Next Friend for Wayne Denno v. School Board of Volusia County, Florida Dennis Roberts, an Individual | green | “in the court's attempt to identify the legal landscape that would have been apparent to such a reasonable school official, it is instructive to take note of the perspective of several reasonable jurists who have attempted to articulate the relevant legal landscape” | 3 |
| 3 | CEL v. State | green | “the threshold for establishing the commission of obstruction under 843.02, fla. stat. is that the officer be in the 'lawful execution' of a 'legal duty.' to meet this threshold, the conduct of the officer must be consistent with the fourth amendment . . . .” | 3 |
| 4 | Tracht v. Commissioner of Public Safety | green | “there was no basis for distinguishing the officers' entry into the garage from entering a porch to knock on a door to a house” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Jenkins | green | “was part and parcel of the structure constituting his home, and was secured with a door closed at the time police arrived at the home” | 3 |
| 6 | Kauz v. United States | green | “broke in the front door, entered appellant's living quarters, went through them, forced his way into the garage, and there saw appellant.” | 3 |
| 7 | Kauz v. United States | green | “which was open about three feet.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.