Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from San Antonio Area Foundation v. Lang.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio Area Foundation v. Lang Anchor | green | “in this light, courts must not redraft wills to vary or add provisions 'under the guise of construction of the language of the will' to reach a presumed intent.” | 13 |
| 2 | Sanderson v. First National Bank in Dallas | green | “add to, subtract from, amend, correct, reform, revise, or rewrite the will even if the court might think that the testator was unreasonable, unjust or unwise in bequeathing and devising his property as he did.” | 5 |
| 3 | Penland v. Agnich | green | “any other great-grandchildren who may be born after my death” | 5 |
| 4 | Dunn v. County of Dallas | green | “no other order rescinding, modifying, or otherwise changing this recusal order is in the record.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.