Topic: a malicious combination of two or more persons to injure an… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1658

8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 169 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kenty v. Transamerica Premium Insurance.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Kenty v. Transamerica Premium Insurance Anchor
ohio · 1995
green “a malicious combination of two or more persons to injure another in person or property, in a way not competent for one alone, resulting in actual damages.” 63
2 Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
ohio · 1983
green “so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.” 33
3 Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.
ohio · 1998
green “an underlying unlawful act is required before a civil conspiracy claim can succeed.” 23
4 Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc.
ohioctapp · 1993
green “(1) a malicious combination; (2) two or more persons; (3) injury to person or property; and (4) existence of an unlawful act independent from the actual conspiracy.” 19
5 Gosden v. Louis
ohioctapp · 1996
green “does not require a showing of an express agreement between defendants, but only a common understanding or design, even if tacit, to commit an unlawful act.” 14
6 Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City Bank
ca6 · 2006
green “it is unclear whether ohio recognizes a common law cause of action for aiding and abetting tortious conduct.” 7
7 Walburn v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
ca6 · 2005
green “a plaintiff, at a minimum, must allege the time, place, and content of the alleged misrepresentation on which he or she relied; the fraudulent scheme; the fraudulent intent of the defendants; and the injury resulting from the fraud.” 5
8 Andonian v. A.C. & S., Inc.
ohioctapp · 1994
green “(1) knowledge that the primary party's conduct is a breach of duty and (2) substantial assistance or encouragement to the primary party in carrying out the tortious act.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check