Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John McWilliams v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John McWilliams v. United States Anchor | green | “has so saturated the community as to have a probable impact on the prospective jurors” | 13 |
| 2 | Hart v. State | green | “thus, a change of venue must be granted only when it can be shown that the pretrial publicity has so pervasively saturated' the community as to make the court proceedings nothing more than a” | 7 |
| 3 | Joiner v. State | green | “a trial court is in a better position than an appellate court to determine what effect, if any, pretrial publicity might have in a particular case.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hunt v. State | green | “rarely' applicable, and is reserved for only extreme situations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.