Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 275 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp. Anchor | green | “while a previous judgment precludes recovery on claims arising prior to its entry, it cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not even then exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case.” | 177 |
| 2 | Union Carbide Corporation v. Virginia Richards | green | “typically it is a new factual development that gives rise to a fresh cause of action.” | 98 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.