Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yasmin Lalani, Khairunissa Lalani and Nurudeen Lalani v. Brian R. Perryman, Acting District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yasmin Lalani, Khairunissa Lalani and Nurudeen Lalani v. Brian R. Perryman, Acting District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “the apa is not a useful tool for aliens challenging immigration decisions.” | 6 |
| 2 | Mihai Fedorca v. Brian Perryman, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “fedorca seeks as relief only a stay of deportation pending his appeal to the bia-or in other words, review of the decision to execute his deportation, which is barred by 1252(g).” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Doris Fischer | green | “there must be a '"demonstrated probability” | 3 |
| 4 | Boguslaw Fornalik v. Brian Perryman, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “his claim was not that the attorney general was unfairly executing a removal order, but rather that a prior, un related error made his removal improper.” | 3 |
| 5 | Trinity 83 Development LLC v. Colfin Midwest Funding LLC | green | “mootness is a consti tutional doctrine designed to avoid the issuance of advisory opinions. 'a suit becomes moot ... when it is impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever to the prevailing party.” | 3 |
| 6 | Yeison Meza Morales v. William Barr | green | “removal order remained on the books, though, and meza morales con tinued to petition our court for review of it.” | 3 |
| 7 | Syed Tazu v. Attorney General United States | green | “any other rule would gut 1252(g).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.