Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George v. Celotex Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George v. Celotex Corp. Anchor | green | “an out of court statement offered not for the truth of the matter asserted, but merely to show that the defendant was on notice of a danger, is not hearsay.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Schnejer Zalman Gurary, Nochum Sternberg and Esther Sternberg | green | “in general, conscious avoidance instructions are only appropriate where knowledge of an existing fact, and not knowledge of the result of defendant's conduct, is in question.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. William Jones, Dwayne Frederick and Alson Schmidt | green | “the entire charge to see if the instructions as a whole correctly comported with the law.” | 3 |
| 4 | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,997 United States of America v. Paul Russo, Barbara Hosman, William Petrokansky | green | “diverts the attention of the jury to questions of little significance” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. John Gole | green | “limited to the quite peculiar facts that compelled its result,” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Ewan Bryce, Also Known as Ian, Darren Johnson, Also Known as D-Nice, Also Known as D | green | “all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and draw all reasonable inferences in its favor.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Deborah A. Brown | green | “resulted in an incomplete record or inadequate findings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.