Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of Belize.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of Belize Anchor | green | “consistent with the 'emphatic federal policy in favor of arbitral dispute resolution' recognized by the supreme court, ... the faa affords the district court little discretion in refusing or deferring enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.” | 15 |
| 2 | U.S. Titan, Inc. v. Guangzhou Zhen Hua Shipping Co., Ltd. | green | “(1) there is a written agreement; (2) the writing provides for arbitration in the territory of a signatory of the convention; (3) the subject matter is commercial; and (4) the subject matter is not entirely domestic in scope.” | 6 |
| 3 | Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of Belize | green | “arises out of or in connection with commerce.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.