Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stettner v. Smith (In Re IFS Financial Corp.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stettner v. Smith (In Re IFS Financial Corp.) Anchor | green | “texas law counsels that the legal titleholder to a bank account is not always the owner of its contents.” | 5 |
| 2 | In Re Blondheim Real Estate, Inc. | green | “has the connotation of some recovery other than the simple recovery of an unpaid debt due upon an instrument.” | 4 |
| 3 | Timothy J. Henderson, Trustee v. Neil Buchanan, and Bruno Menicucci, Anna Menicucci, and Menicucci Insurance Services, Inc. | green | “the whole operation amounted to a ponzi scheme.” | 3 |
| 4 | Stettner v. Smith (In Re IFS Financial Corp.) | green | “control is decisive, and that legal title is irrelevant where, as here, a debtor organization has taken care to mask its activities through fictional divisions.” | 3 |
| 5 | In the Matter of Southmark Corporation, Debtor. Southmark Corporation v. Joseph Grosz | green | “a preliminary requisite under section 547(b) is that the transfer involve property of the debtor's estate.” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Maruki USA Co., Inc. | green | “parties to any lease or operating agreement” | 3 |
| 7 | Terrill Horton v. Walter O'Cheskey | green | “the bankruptcy court's finding that ahf did not receive any value in exchange for its guaranty of the lp investment was not clearly erroneous” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.