Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 268 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jesus Padilla-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jesus Padilla-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr. Anchor | green | “to prevail on a due-process claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of rights and prejudice.” | 111 |
| 2 | Tijani v. Holder | green | “we lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien's administrative proceedings before the bia.” | 103 |
| 3 | Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William Barr | green | “the lack of time, date, and place in the nta sent to petitioner did not deprive the immigration court of jurisdiction over her case” | 38 |
| 4 | Tijani v. Holder | green | “we generally will not take up arguments not raised in an alien's opening brief before this court.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.