Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nash v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nash v. State Anchor | green | “in cases such as the present one where injury occurs as the result of domestic violence, which may alter the course of diagnosis and treatment, trial courts may properly exercise their discretion in admitting statements regarding identity of the perpetrator.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Galvan | green | “leaves the evidence close enough to the transaction so that the trial court could have believed any presumption of fabrication was excluded” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Coppage | green | “victims of domestic violence often recant their initial statements to police” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Atwood | green | “jerked the wheel-or steering wheel way too hard and i thought he was mad.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Hildreth | green | “ascertaining the identity of the child's abuser is a matter that may assist in diagnosis or treatment of an emotional or psychological injury.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Brown | green | “about 80 to 85 percent of victims 'actually recant at some point in the process” | 3 |
| 7 | State of Louisiana v. David J. Koederitz | green | “the statements at issue in the present case are also non-testimonial for purposes of the sixth amendment confrontation clause because they were not 'procured with a primary purpose of creating an out-of-court substitute for trial testimony.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.