Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bruce A. Coane v. Ferrara Pan Candy Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Three Brothers Bakery, Inc., Third-Party.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruce A. Coane v. Ferrara Pan Candy Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Three Brothers Bakery, Inc., Third-Party Anchor | green | “dismissal with prejudice typically is appropriate only if the refusal to comply results from willfulness or bad faith and is accompanied by a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct.” | 13 |
| 2 | Manax v. McNamara | green | “the degree of recklessness, bad faith, or improper motive required for a finding that sartain has multiplied the proceedings 'unreasonably and vexatiously.” | 5 |
| 3 | Bruce A. Coane v. Ferrara Pan Candy Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Three Brothers Bakery, Inc., Third-Party | green | “must substantially prejudice the opposing party.” | 3 |
| 4 | Bruce A. Coane v. Ferrara Pan Candy Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Three Brothers Bakery, Inc., Third-Party | green | “timely and appropriate preparation for trial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.