Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Supreme Instruments Corp. v. Lehr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supreme Instruments Corp. v. Lehr Anchor | green | “requisite care remains always that degree of care commensurate with appreciable danger appraised in terms of ordinary prudence and interpreted in the light of the attendant circumstances.” | 5 |
| 2 | United Roofing and Siding Company v. Seefeld | green | “not liable for death or injury of an independent contractor or one of his employees resulting from dangers which the contractor, as an expert, has known, or as to which he and his employees 'assumed the risk” | 4 |
| 3 | Buford v. JITNEY JUNGLE STORES OF AMERICA | green | “alternative duty of (a) providing a reasonably safe place to work or (b) giving warning” | 3 |
| 4 | Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. McDougald | green | “duty ... to turn over ... a reasonably safe place to work or to give warning of danger” | 3 |
| 5 | Stanley v. Morgan & Lindsey, Inc. | green | “not required to anticipate an unusual and improbable result” | 3 |
| 6 | Millers of Jackson, Meadowbrook Road v. Newell | green | “our law requires that a landowner must remove those hazards of which he has actual or constructive notice” | 3 |
| 7 | Wilson v. Allday | green | “exercise ordinary care, keeping the premises in a reasonably safe condition or warning of dangerous conditions not readily apparent” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.