Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 187 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. Anchor | green | “disclose to the parties any dealings that might create an impression of possible bias.” | 69 |
| 2 | Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. | green | “any tribunal permitted by law to try cases and controversies not only must be unbiased but also must avoid even the appearance of bias.” | 47 |
| 3 | Morelite Construction Corp. v. New York City District Council Carpenters Benefit Funds | green | “a reasonable person would have to conclude that an arbitrator was partial to one party to the arbitration.” | 42 |
| 4 | Peoples Security Life Insurance Company v. Monumental Life Insurance Company B. Larry Jenkins Ronald J. Brittingham Thomas R. Jenkins Willard E. Hines | green | “must establish specific facts that indicate improper motives on the part of an arbitrator.” | 10 |
| 5 | Jean Schmitz Leonard Schmitz v. Carlos J. Zilveti, III Nicholas S. Meris Prudential-Bache Securities Inc., AKA Prudential Securities, Inc. | green | “the parties can choose their arbitrators intelligently only when facts showing potential partiality are disclosed.” | 6 |
| 6 | Toyota of Berkeley, a Corporation v. Automobile Salesmen's Union, Local 1095, United Food and Commercial Workers Union | green | “reasonable impression of partiality” | 4 |
| 7 | Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp. | green | “opinion fully envisions upholding awards when arbitrators fail to disclose insubstantial relationships.” | 3 |
| 8 | San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. | green | “to emasculate the policy of the law in favor of the finality of arbitration,” | 3 |
| 9 | In re the Arbitration between Cross Properties, Inc. & Gimbel Bros. | green | “peripheral, superficial or insignificant,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.