Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy of Union University.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Papelino v. Albany College of Pharmacy of Union University Anchor | green | “an implied contract is formed when a university accepts a student for enrollment: if the student complies with the terms prescribed by the university and completes the required courses, the university must award him a degree.” | 9 |
| 2 | Nungesser v. Columbia University | green | “state a claim for breach of such a contract, a student must identify 'specifically designated and discrete promises.” | 9 |
| 3 | Gally v. Columbia University | green | “general promises about ethical standards" that are "subject to neither quantification nor objective evaluation" "are far different from the types of specific promises which have led to valid breach of contract claims against universities.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.