Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ryan Pouliot.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ryan Pouliot Anchor | green | “double jeopardy clause permits successive punishment or prosecution of multiple offenses arising out of the same conduct only if each offense contains a unique element.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Matthew Elder | green | “possessing equipment or chemicals, or both, for the purpose of manufacturing a dangerous drug.” | 4 |
| 3 | Harbin v. Sessions | green | “if some jurors believed that a defendant had sold cocaine, and others believed that he had sold heroin” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Matthew Elder | green | “criminalized conduct related to 'dangerous drugs' as a broad category, rather than any specific drugs,” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Matthew Elder | green | “the structural separation of the term 'dangerous drug' from its definition makes its indivisibility clear,” | 3 |
| 6 | Juan Garcia-Martinez v. William P. Barr | green | “he may have gone to trial, or he may have pleaded guilty to a different statutory violation calling for additional incarceration but less serious immigration consequences.” | 3 |
| 7 | Juan Garcia-Martinez v. William P. Barr | green | “legal issues ... receive plenary review in this court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.