Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carratelli v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carratelli v. State Anchor | green | “where a postconviction motion alleges that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise or preserve a cause challenge, the defendant must demonstrate that a juror was actually biased.” | 13 |
| 2 | Troy v. State | green | “will not be sustained where the jury was aware of most aspects of the mitigation evidence that the defendant claims should have been presented.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cooper v. Secretary, Department of Corrections | green | “they did nothing further to develop background information to support their mitigation theory.” | 3 |
| 4 | Guardado v. State | green | “it just seemed not to go that way, she would not die.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.