Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher Anchor | green | “raise a substantial question likely to result in reversal of all counts on which imprisonment is imposed” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. Fletcher | green | “demanding standard . . . to accord with the expressed congressional intent to increase the required showing on the part of the defendant.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Zimny | green | “defendant has met his burden to show entitlement to release from custody pending appeal under 3143(b)(1).” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Joseph Fischer | red | “adopted the broad reading of the statute . . . to uphold the prosecution of defendants who allegedly participated in the capitol riot,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.