Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Long v. Long.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Long v. Long Anchor | green | “the mere introduction of evidence does not entitle the proponent to a finding thereon, since the trial court must pass on its weight and credibility.” | 5 |
| 2 | Supplee v. Miller-Motte Business College | green | “our court reviews the trial court's ruling on the admissibility of affidavits for an abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
| 3 | Supplee v. Miller-Motte Business College | green | “even assuming arguendo that the trial court abused its discretion . . . , the plaintiff has failed to show any resulting prejudice” | 3 |
| 4 | Beroth Oil Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Transp. | green | “seeks to protect courts, not litigants, from individuals who would play fast and loose with the judicial system,' and it is an inherently flexible and discretionary doctrine.” | 3 |
| 5 | Yadkin Valley Land Co. v. Baker | green | “been open and notorious such that the true owner had notice of the claim” | 3 |
| 6 | Yadkin Valley Land Co. v. Baker | green | “mere permissive use of a way over another's land cannot ripen into an easement by prescription no matter how long it continues.” | 3 |
| 7 | Yadkin Valley Land Co. v. Baker | green | “prescriptive easements are not favored in the law, and the burden is therefore on the claiming party to prove every essential element thereof.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.