Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Byron Pierson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Byron Pierson Anchor | green | “we presume that the jury followed the court's instructions absent evidence of an overwhelming probability that the jury was unable to follow the instructions as given.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Rick Coley | green | “we give great deference to the jury's verdict, viewing the trial evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and drawing all reasonable inferences in the government's favor.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Calimlim | green | “an above-board arrangement with a housekeeper whose immigration status was not in question would have cost the defendants a great deal more money” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Ruben Porraz | green | “so long as the judge offers an adequate statement of his reasons consistent with the sentencing factors nos. 24-2977, 24-3017, 24-3018 15 enumerated in 18 u.s.c. 3553 (a).” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Grayson Enterprises, Inc. | green | “the key question for a harboring case under 1324(a)(1)(a)(iii).” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Antwan Eiland | green | “convert testimony that has been compromised into testimony that is incredible as a matter of law.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Antwan Eiland | green | “the high bar for deeming evidence insufficient extends still higher where, as here, the defendant challenges the credibility of witnesses.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.