Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Burton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Burton Anchor | green | “it is well settled that waiver of counsel must be clear and unequivocal, not ambiguous.” | 6 |
| 2 | People v. Barner | green | “by choosing to testify, a defendant puts his credibility on the line.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Murdock | green | “because the officer activated his overhead emergency lights and siren, defendant should have known that the pursuer was a police officer and the purpose of the statute would be fulfilled by upholding the conviction.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. LeFlore | green | “his degree of legal sophistication made it evident that he was aware of the information that compliance with the rule would have conveyed.” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Williams | green | “although the statute may be read to mandate that the officer must be in uniform before the defendant can be charged with fleeing and eluding a police officer, here the goal of the statute is plainly met by defendant's pulling over in the first place.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.